Legal Opinion

Kuyrkendall v. Clark's Discount Department Store

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1969No. 6921SC299PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The defendant presents twenty-seven assignments of error. However, we will refrain from discussing all of them since we think a new trial is required and many, if not all, of these various assignments of error may not occur again.

We are of the opinion that the trial judge committed prejudicial error in his charge on the issue of compensatory damages.

In the complaint the plaintiff alleged that by reason of her detention and imprisonment she was “subjected to great indignities, humiliation and disgrace” and “greatly injured in her credit and circumstances, and was caused to suffer such pain in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. Beaty Service Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Kee v. . DillinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Cummings v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Pressley v. PressleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matthews ex rel. Bralley v. LineberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API