Paulos v. Koelsch
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice. '
Plaintiff sued appellant for an injury received while being carried as a passenger in one of its cabs in the city of Minneapolis, and recovered. The appeal is from the order denying its motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. i
The short facts are these: About 2:30 o’clock a. m. of December 31, 1932, plaintiff and three other persons entered one of appellant’s cabs at 111 South Ninth street, Minneapolis, to be carried to Loring Cafe, on the east side of Nicollet avenue, between Fourteenth street and Grant street. The cab in its travel…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Strommen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Belyea v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Sainte Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Fox v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Sund v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Waltzinger v. BirsnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Ford v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Boland v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Janke v. JankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972