Legal Opinion

Strommen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 2, 1932No. Nos. 28,978, 28,979PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

The two actions, tried together, were for the recovery on two $1,000 insurance policies issued by defendant on the life of Raymond Strommen, a son of plaintiffs, who were named in the policies as beneficiaries. Each policy provided for double indemnity if death occurred as a result of bodily injuries effected solely through external, violent, and accidental means, as specified therein. The insured died. The single indemnity was paid. Payment of the accident indemnity was refused, and these suits brought. Plaintiffs had a verdict for the full amount claimed.- Defendant’s motion for judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  2. White v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Taylor v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Williams v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Ludwig v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. WoelfleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  2. Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Order of United Commercial Travelers v. ShaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. Jensma v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API