Legal Opinion

American Express Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1924No. 2200PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Circuity Judge.

In the opinion of the learned judge who heard this case below, and which under the caption of The Hoxie is reported in 291 Fed. 599, nearly all the legally material facts are sufficiently stated. Two questions of much interest and importance have been ably argued before us The first is: Does the creation of a maritime lien for supplies depend upon the law of the port at which they were furnished, as was held in The Scotia (D. C.) 35 Fed. 907, in the Kaiser Wilhelm II (D. C.) 230 Fed. 717, and in the Woudrichem (D. C.) 278 Fed. 568, or upon that o„f the ship’s flag, as was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. The " Scotland"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Struthers & Dixon, Inc. v. Green Star S. S. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
  4. Mills v. The ScotiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1888
  5. The Kaiser Wilhelm IIDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Certain Subfreights Due Steamship NeponsetDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1924
  2. Riffe Ex Rel. Riffe v. MagushiDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994
  3. The Fort GainesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1928
  4. The Fort GainesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
  5. United States v. Lutwak. United States v. Knoll. United States v. TreitlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API