Legal Opinion

Heffner v. Gross

California Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1919No. L. A. No. 4693PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant.

The complaint states a cause of action for damages from the breach of an agreement alleged to have been made as a part of the consideration for a contract between the plaintiff and defendant for an exchange of their respective tracts of land. The contract of exchange was made in November, 1910. The defendant owned a tract of 280 acres of land, on a certain forty-acre tract of which the Southern Pacific Railroad Company had an easement to maintain a well and pumping plant by which to supply water for its station at Ravenna. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bradford Investment Co. v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Gardiner v. McDonoghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Johnson v. D. H. Bibb Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Flynn v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Johnstone v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. A. B. C. Distributing Co. v. Distillers Distributing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Thoroman v. DavidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Buckley v. Shell Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API