Legal Opinion

Thoroman v. David

California Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1926No. Docket No. L.A. 9182PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

In this action of claim and delivery the complaint alleges that on January 16, 1922, the defendant sold to plaintiff certain real property and all furniture on the premises. The defendant contends in his answer that the real property alone was sold to the plaintiff and that no furniture was included in the sale. The court found that the furniture was included in the sale and that the plaintiff paid for the same; that the plaintiff took possession of the premises on February 9, 1922, and that on the preceding day, February 8, the defendant wrongfully took possession of the furniture and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Neher v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Pico v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Benson v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Heffner v. GrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Schwartz v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Pollyanna Homes, Inc. v. BerneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Todd v. VestermarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API