Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Rousso

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 4, 1921No. Nos. 1403, 1404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeals from the Commissioner of Patents. Two proceedings to determine priority of invention between Harry Solomon and Jacques Rousso and two other parties. Prom a decision of the Assistant Commissioner, awarding priority to Rousso, Solomon alone appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

These appeals from decisions of the Corn-missioner of Patents question respect to an invention defined by the following counts:

Count 1. In a device of the class described, a towel support and a retaining member extending upwardly from said support and then downwardly sufficiently to constitute a suitable guide for a towel while in use, substantially as described.

Count 2. In a device of the class described, a towel support and a retaining member extending upwardly from adjacent the outer edge of said support and then downwardly sufficiently to constitute a suitable guide…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rousso v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
  2. Rousso v. First Nat. Bank in DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  3. Rousso v. First Nat. Bank in DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1927
  4. Rousso v. BarberDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API