Legal Opinion
Rousso v. First Nat. Bank in Detroit
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 11, 1927No. 472PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, District Judge.
This suit was brought on Rousso patent, No. 1,157,046, and Olsen patent, No. 1,295,578, owned by Rousso.
The invention set forth in the Rousso patent is simple and useful, and is designed to prevent the theft of towels from public washrooms by threading them on a rod whieh extends upward from a supporting shelf, then forward and downward in the form of a gooseneck, and backward into a receptacle for the soiled towels.
*248The claims of this Rousso patent in suit' are as follows:
“1. In a device of the class described, a towel support, and a retaining member extending upwardly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. A. Klipstein & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
- Cincinnati Butchers' Supply Co. v. Walker Bin Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Rousso v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- Flat Slabs Patents Co. v. Wright, Barrett & Stilwell Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1920
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Olymplan Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carson Inv. Co. v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Lektophone Corp. v. Miller Bros.District Court, D. Delaware · 1930
- Barber Asphalt Corp. v. La Fera Grecco Contracting Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1939
- Carson Inv. Co. v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Carson Inv. Co. v. Calumet & Arizona Mining Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1928