Legal Opinion

Rousso v. Barber

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 11, 1923No. 479PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This suit is based on the usual bill in equity, complaining of infringement of patent No. 1,157,-046, granted on October 19, 1915, to Jacques Rousso, for towel cabinets, and praying for the usual relief.

The defendants admit that, if the plaintiff’s patent is valid, the defendants have infringed it. They rely for defense upoii the alleged prior invention of Harry Solomon. The application for the plaintiff’s patent was filed on January 12, 1912, and issued on October 19, 1915, without the claims in question becoming involved in interference with application for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bresnahan v. Tripp Giant Leveller Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
  2. Western Electric Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1910
  3. Solomon v. RoussoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rousso v. First Nat. Bank in DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  2. Rousso v. First Nat. Bank in DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API