Cisco v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
Sophie Cisco (Claimant) appeals from the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s decision terminating Claimant’s benefits under Section 408 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act).1
*176Claimant suffered a back injury on July 11, 1978, while employed at the A & P Tea Company (Employer) and began receiving disability compensation pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable. Claimant returned to work in September of 1978, but during the next two years suffered periodic reoccurrences of her injury which resulted in a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- JAB Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Jones v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Young v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Coastal Tank Lines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Campbell Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bethlehem Mines Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Evanick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Pecht v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- J. McFillin v. WCAB (Twp. of Lower Merion & Delaware Valley WC Trust)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- J.R. May v. Dana Corp. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024