Legal Opinion
Pecht v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 17, 1988No. Appeal, No. 970 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Senior Judge Narick,
Sharon F. Pecht (Claimant) appeals from a decision of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board). We affirm.
The record discloses the following. Claimant was employed by The Arrow Company, Cluett-Peabody (Employer) as a bottom hemmer. Claimants job duties required her to pick up bundles which weighed approximately thirty pounds, place them on a table, and when finished sewing the shirt hems in her bundle, she was required to put the bundle on a truck. Claimant testified that her job involved a lot of bilateral twisting. On February 20, 1984, Claimant injured…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Bailey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Povanda v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992