Legal Opinion

Evanick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1987No. Appeal, No. 2065 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

Frank Evanick (claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s decision to grant compensation benefits to the claimant for a closed period from May 17, 1980 through November 9, 1980 due to a *441work-related aggravation of a previously existing work-related injury and to suspend benefits thereafter. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The claimant was employed by Fisher Scientific Company (employer) as an assembly line painter. On December 1, 1976, he suffered a compensable back injury and was paid workmens…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Venanzio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Jones v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Latta v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Cisco v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosenberger v. City of Casper Board of AdjustmentWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Rosenberger v. City of Casper Board of AdjustmentWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API