Legal Opinion

SK Builders, Inc. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 29, 2019No. 2 CA-CV 2018-0008Published

1Opinion of the Court

STARING, Presiding Judge:

¶1 Michael and Sandi Smith appeal the trial court's judgment that they violated Arizona's Prompt Pay Act ("APPA"), A.R.S. §§ 32-1129 to 32-1129.07, by failing to pay or object in writing to a payment application submitted to them for construction of their new home. The Smiths also argue the court erroneously concluded no issues remained in their lawsuit against the concrete subcontractor after granting the subcontractor summary judgment. Finally, they challenge the attorney fees awarded to both the general contractor and concrete subcontractor as unreasonable. For the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Cullen v. Auto-Owners InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API