Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Osgood

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1870PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

Osgood sued Kemper, Phelps, and Young on a promissory note. As to Young, the suit was dismissed. Kemper made default. Phelps answered. Demurrers were sustained to the third, fourth, fifth, and seventh paragraphs, and the second and sixth were stricken out on motion of the plaintiff No question is made as to the correctness of the rulings of the court on the demurrers or on the motion to strike out. The first paragraph of the answer of Phelps was a general denial, and the eighth was a denial of the execution of the note, sworn to by Phelps.

With the issues thus made, the case was called for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. NoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Spaulding v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Goldsberry v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brumbaugh v. StockmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Masten v. Indiana Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Moore v. HornerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Kreite v. KreiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Yancy v. TeterIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API