Stokes v. Magnolia Milling Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— The purpose of this action was to recover damages for personal injuries. The cause was tried to a court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand dollars. The defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and, in the alternative, for a new trial, both of which motions were overruled. Judgment was entered upon the verdict, from which the defendant appeals.
The facts, as the jury had a right to find them from the evidence offered by the respondent, may be summarized as follows: The accident out of which the litigation arose happened…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gabrielsen v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Burge v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Child v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Tenneson v. Kadiak Fisheries Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brammer v. LappenbuschWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Keisel v. BredickWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Herndon v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Gooschin v. LaddWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Patterson v. KroghWashington Supreme Court · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.