Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Magnolia Milling Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1931No. 23167. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— The purpose of this action was to recover damages for personal injuries. The cause was tried to a court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand dollars. The defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and, in the alternative, for a new trial, both of which motions were overruled. Judgment was entered upon the verdict, from which the defendant appeals.

The facts, as the jury had a right to find them from the evidence offered by the respondent, may be summarized as follows: The accident out of which the litigation arose happened…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gabrielsen v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Burge v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Child v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Tenneson v. Kadiak Fisheries Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brammer v. LappenbuschWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Keisel v. BredickWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Herndon v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Gooschin v. LaddWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Patterson v. KroghWashington Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API