Tenneson v. Kadiak Fisheries Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. The cause came on for trial before the court and a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant challenged the sufficiency thereof, and moved for a judgment, which motion was overruled. The defendant offered no testimony, but rested upon the case made by the plaintiff. A verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $3,750 was returned. Motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and in the alternative for a new trial, being made and overruled, judgment was entered upon the verdict, from which the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Reed v. Director General of RailroadsSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Gabrielsen v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Rasmussen v. Twin Harbor Stevedoring & Tug Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
- Hellenthal v. EdmonsonWashington Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burge v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Calkins v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Herndon v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Gooschin v. LaddWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Neeley v. BockWashington Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.