Legal Opinion

Child v. Hill

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1928No. 21188. En BancPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

This action was instituted by plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by him as the result of being struck by an automobile, driven by defendant. The action was tried to a jury, and from a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

In the first place, appellant assigns error based upon the overruling of his objections to certain questions propounded to prospective jurors upon their voir dire; respondent’s attorney having been permitted, to interrogate the members of the panel as to any possible connection on their part with any insurance or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stratton v. C. H. Nichols Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State v. Northern Express Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Quon v. Furuya Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Armstrong v. Yakima Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Lucchesi v. ReynoldsWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. King v. StarrWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Melton v. United Retail MerchantsWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Anselmo v. MorsingWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hanford v. GoehryWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Stokes v. Magnolia Milling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API