Legal Opinion

Former Employees of Bell Helicopter Textron v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 29, 1994No. Court No. 93-01-00024Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Musgrave, Judge:

Plaintiffs, former employees of Bell Helicopter Tex-tron (“Bell Helicopter”) move this Court for judgment upon the agency record pursuant to United States Court of International Trade Rule (“USCITR”) 56.1. Plaintiffs contend the Department of Labor’s (“Labor”) negative determination of eligibility for certification for trade adjustment assistance benefits is not supported by substantial evidence on the record and is not otherwise in accordance with law under the Trade Act of 1974 as amended. 19 U.S.C. § 2272 (1988).

Discussion

Anegative determination by the Secretary of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  4. Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  5. Julian R. Woodrum, Dennis Dorsey and Sherman Johnson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API