Legal Opinion
In Re the Care & Treatment of Manigo
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided June 2, 2010No. 4692PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.
The State commenced an action pursuant to the South Carolina Sexually Violent Predator Act 1 (the Act), alleging Bobbie Manigo met the statutory criteria for confinement as a sexually violent predator (SVP). Based on the Act, the State sought Manigo’s commitment in a secure facility for long-term care, control, and treatment. The jury found Manigo was an SVP, and the trial court issued an order committing Manigo to the Department of Mental Health for long-term care and treatment. Manigo argues the trial court erroneously: (1) denied his motion for summary judgment; (2) allowed hearsay…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PittmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- In Re the Care & Treatment of McCrackenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- City of Columbia v. American Civil Liberties Union of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Townes v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- Laurens Emergency Medical Specialists, PA v. M.S. Bailey & Sons BankersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. Floyd Y.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. CommanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- In Re the Care & Treatment of MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- In re the Care & Treatment of ManigoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- In Re the Care & Treatment of MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.