Legal Opinion
Regions Bank v. Strawn
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided August 22, 2012No. 5027PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKonduros, J.
Regions Bank (the Bank) appeals the trial court’s award of damages to subsequent purchasers of real property (the Property) under section 29-3-320 of the South Carolina Code (2007) for the Bank’s failure to mark satisfied a mortgage on the Property. We affirm.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Richard Strawn owned the Property, which was located in Anderson, South Carolina. He gave the Bank a home equity mortgage (the Mortgage) on the Property to secure a credit line of $50,000. The mortgage provided that it would be “governed by and interpreted in accordance -with federal law and the laws of the State…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- TNS Mills, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Town of Summerville v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Broadhurst v. City of Myrtle Beach Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bone v. U.S. Food ServiceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Annie L. Myers v. Town of Calhoun FallsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
- Regions Bank v. StrawnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015