Legal Opinion

Kinnard v. Mecklenburg Fair, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1980No. 7926SC917PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

Plaintiff by his first assignment of error contends that the court erred in denying his motion to amend his complaint to include a second claim for relief based on unfair and deceptive acts and practices in violation of G.S. 75-1.1. It has been repeatedly held that a motion under Rule 15(a), N.C. Rules Civ. Proc. for leave of court to amend a pleading is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge and the denial of such motion is not reviewable absent a clear showing of an abuse of discretion. Hudspeth v. Bunzey, 35 N.C. App. 231, 241 S.E. 2d 119, cert.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Harris & Harris Construction Co. v. Crain & Denbo, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Gro-Mar Public Relations, Inc. v. Billy Jack Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. H. M. Wade Manufacturing Co. v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Hudspeth v. BunzeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Henry v. DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Chicora Country Club, Inc. v. Town of ErwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Martin v. HareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Strickland v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Chrisalis Properties, Inc. v. Separate Quarters, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API