Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hare

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1985No. 8518SC322PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Plaintiffs sued for damages to their boat occurring during the defendants’ hauling of the boat from the Ohio River to Lake Norman. The jury awarded $36,500 to the plaintiffs. Defendants appealed, alleging the improper admission of testimony regarding whether the boat was improperly hauled on the trailer, and assigning error to the trial court’s jury instructions on bailment. On cross-appeal, the plaintiffs contend the trial court erred by refusing to give a requested instruction on loss of use damages. For reasons stated below, we find no error. The essential facts follow:

In May…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Bryant v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Summerlin v. Carolina & North-Western RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Smith v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Walker v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Harrold v. DowdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Kinsey v. SpannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Wilkerson v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. Chicopee, Inc. v. Sims Metal Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API