Legal Opinion

Carr-Cullen Co. v. Deming

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 1928No. 26,827PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Appeal by five defendants from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Action to foreclose certain mechanics’ liens and to have them declared to be prior to a mortgage. The trial court held that the mechanics’ liens were subordinate to the mortgage. Defendant Deming was the owner of a lot in Minneapolis on which there was a one-story frame business building. It was divided into two parts, one of which was occupied by him as a real estate office and the other was occupied by Mr. Kunsch. Deming sold the property to Kunsch for $5,500, $500 of which was paid in cash and the balance secured by a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lamoreaux v. AnderschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Erickson v. IrelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Landers-Morrison-Christenson Co. v. Ambassador Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Diversified Mortgage Investors v. Lloyd D. Blaylock General Contractor, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Reuben E. Johnson Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. National Lumber Co. v. Farmer & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Brettschneider v. WellmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. R.B. Thompson, Jr. Lumber Co. v. Windsor Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API