Legal Opinion
Saunders v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 6, 2011No. Civil Action 02-01803 (CKK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Theresa Weston Saunders (“Saunders”) commenced this action against the District of Columbia (the “District”), and two District officials, alleging among other things that she was retaliated against in violation of the Federal False Claims Act (the “F-FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq., for disclosures she purportedly made concerning the use and management of federal funding by the District’s Office of Chief Technology Officer. 1 Presently before the Court is the District’s [77] Renewed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Federal False…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gibbs v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
- United States ex rel. Berglund v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Calliham v. Preventive Measures of Washington, Dc, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025