Legal Opinion

Owusu v. Motor Vehicle Admin.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 20, 2018No. 10/18PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHotten, J.

Petitioner, Bradford Owusu, ("Petitioner") seeks review of a decision of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, which affirmed the administrative law judge who held that Petitioner was fully advised of the sanctions imposed upon him after refusing a chemical test. Petitioner presents a constitutional due process claim and a statutory "fail to advise" argument, as reflected in the following questions for review:

1. Is it a violation of due process and a failure to "fully advise" a driver of the administrative penalties that shall be imposed for refusing a breath test pursuant to [Md. Code,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gigeous v. Eastern Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Forman v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Hare v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Motor Vehicle Administration v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Motor Vehicle Administration v. SeenathCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Motor Vehicle Admin. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API