Legal Opinion

Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Barrett

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 24, 2020No. 22/19PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motor Vehicle Administration v. Brian Barrett, No. 22, September Term, 2019 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — DUE PROCESS — RIGHTS AFFORDED TO DETAINEES — The Court of Appeals held that where a motorist refuses a blood alcohol concentration test pursuant to MD. CODE, ANN., TRANS. § 16-205.1(b) (Lexis Nexis Supp. 2018), if an administrative law judge finds that the motorist was fully advised of his or her rights despite being distracted while the Advice of Rights form was being read, that determination will not be disturbed if it is supported by substantial evidence. Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Bulluck v. Pelham Wood ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Gigeous v. Eastern Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Forman v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Hare v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Portillo Funes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Merryman & F.O.P. v. Univ. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API