Hare v. Motor Vehicle Administration
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.
Sterling Russell Hare, Sr. (“Hare”), petitioned for certiorari, requesting that we consider whether it was fundamentally unfair for his driver’s license to be suspended for his refusal to take a chemical test for alcohol concentration when he was not advised that if he took the test and failed, but met certain conditions, the Motor Vehicle Administration (“MVA”), could modify the suspension or issue a restrictive license. We granted the petition and now affirm.
I
Hare was stopped on suspicion of driving while intoxicated and subsequently arrested on that charge. Having…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. NewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Forman v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. KarwackiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Meanor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.