Legal Opinion

Stoddard v. District of Columbia Public Defender Services

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 3, 2008No. Civil Action 07-0549 (RCL)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.

In this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff sues the District of Columbia Public Defender Service (“PDS”) for allegedly assigning a “non-lawyer, legal counsel imposter” to represent him during parole revocation proceedings before the United States Parole Commission (“USPC”). Compl. at 1. He seeks $5 million on behalf of himself and unnamed plaintiffs. 1 Defendant moves to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim. Because under the circumstances presented, PDS is not a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Settles v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. United States Ex Rel. Rockefeller v. Westinghouse Electric Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harris v. FulwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Person v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. In re Neil's Mazel, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  4. Silvious v. Coca-Cola CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. United States ex rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API