Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Muckle

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 23, 2004No. 03-P-485PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.

An inventory search of the defendant’s motor vehicle led to the discovery of marijuana inside a crumpled Dunkin’ Donuts bag. On appeal from his conviction for illegal possession of marijuana, the defendant contends that (1) the motion judge erred in denying his motion to suppress; (2) the evidence of constructive possession was insufficient to support his conviction; and (3) the trial judge erred in imposing a committed sentence for a first drug offense without making written *679findings as required by G. L. c. 94C, § 34.1 We agree that the motion judge erred in denying the defendant’s motion to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. MatchettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. ThibeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. The People v. Andrew R. BusheyNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. HenleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. BienvenuMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. BaptisteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API