State v. Candelaria
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
{1} We hold in this case that officers, informed that the owner of a car observed under suspicious circumstances had a suspended driver’s license, have reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. Subsequent events during the stop permitted an expansion of the scope of the stop without creating a constitutional problem. We therefore affirm the denial of Defendant’s motion to suppress.
BACKGROUND
{2} Both arresting officers testified at the suppression hearing and, despite minor conflicts in their testimony, the facts on which the district court relied are undisputed.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. Jason L.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. VandenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. PikeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. Randy J.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. YazzieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. CummingsIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. HicksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.