Legal Opinion

State v. Candelaria

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 23, 2010No. 28,565PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Judge.

{1} We hold in this case that officers, informed that the owner of a car observed under suspicious circumstances had a suspended driver’s license, have reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. Subsequent events during the stop permitted an expansion of the scope of the stop without creating a constitutional problem. We therefore affirm the denial of Defendant’s motion to suppress.

BACKGROUND

{2} Both arresting officers testified at the suppression hearing and, despite minor conflicts in their testimony, the facts on which the district court relied are undisputed.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. Jason L.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. VandenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. PikeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. Randy J.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. YazzieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. CummingsIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. HicksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API