Legal Opinion
In Re Wallace J. Kaminski
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 10, 1992No. Division 92-1PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
I
2Per curiam
As a private citizen, Wallace J. Kaminski sues the special division pro se to compel it, on his application, to appoint an independent counsel to receive evidence he allegedly possesses of misconduct by federal judges and to “act accordingly [and] to prosecute.” However, the Ethics in Government Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 591-599 (the “Act”), does not provide for the appointment of independent counsel to prosecute members of the judiciary nor does it confer standing on private citizens to sue the special division to compel it to appoint independent counsels. The…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Confiscation CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by50 opinions
- Sargeant, Donald B. v. Dixon, HarryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States Ex Rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Caldwell v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- In Re Sealed Case No. 97-3112Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Jenkins v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.