Legal Opinion

Morton W. Southard and James L. Hansberger, Individually and as Partners Doing Business in the Firm Name of H & L Supply v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1955No. 14326_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

The government below obtained a judgment against Morton W. Southard and James L. Hansberger, partners, doing business as H & L Supply, for $3,-459.44 and interest. The total is the sum of two invoices in the respective amounts of $228.13 and $3,231.31 for steel items sold by the War Assets Administration to someone in the Long Beach, California area in 1947.

The date of the formation of the partnership is obscure. H & L Steel Company, Inc., a California corporation, was formed apparently late in 1946. 1 Hans-berger and Southard seem to have been the principal ones in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greenbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  2. Lomax Transportation Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Standard Oil Company of California v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Dit La Porte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. State Ex Rel. Allen v. RadackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. United States v. Tug OttoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API