Legal Opinion
Greenbaum v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 28, 1935No. 7695PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
It is apparent from the argument here that certain evidence, which we find required to support conviction, may not have been produced by the appellee, because it may not have seemed necessary in view of an erroneous assumption of the lower court regarding the admissibility of certain books of account. The facts are involved and cover transactions and accounting in the establishing and development of a large and widely spread business organization, during twenty months of its existence. We, therefore, have undertaken the labor of an extended consideration of the evidence…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Evanston v. GunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Ronkendorff v. Taylor's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Cochran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. GraysonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Standard Oil Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Olender v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.