Legal Opinion

Lomax Transportation Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 1950No. 12422_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, defendant below, on October 2, 1944, contracted to store certain United States naval supplies in its warehouse in Spokane, Washington. The agreement de-. fining the rights and obligations of the parties consisted of a printed form contract of a type ordinarily used for procurement of supplies rather than for storage, in which were inserted special typewritten provisions, one of which read: “Contractor assumes absolute responsibility for property in his possession and shall maintain Bond and Insurance at his own expense in accordance with the State of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The United States, in Error v. Walter Jones, Administrator of Benjamin G. OrrSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  2. United States v. PinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Eighme v. HolcombWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Harvey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  5. United States v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. R. H. Colvin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Whitlock Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  3. United States v. BartholomewDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1956
  4. Morton W. Southard and James L. Hansberger, Individually and as Partners Doing Business in the Firm Name of H & L Supply v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. United States v. School District No. 2District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API