Legal Opinion
United States v. Tug Otto
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 24, 1967No. 66-G-12PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:
NOEL, District Judge.
This is an action brought by the United States under the Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 U.S.C. § 408,1 to recover damages to Texas City .Channel Lighted Buoy #6 (“Buoy #6”), and for the assessment of a penalty under 33 U.S.C. §§ 411 and 412.2
Initially, the suit was directed against the Alamo Water Transportation Co. in personam and the Tug Otto and Barge Alamo 600 in rem. The in personam action against Alamo Water Transportation Co., owner of said barge and tug, has been severed for later disposition, and the Tug Otto has been dismissed from this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wong Wing Foo v. McGrath Atty. Gen. Of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Sylvester Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Rawls Brothers Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1966
- Morton W. Southard and James L. Hansberger, Individually and as Partners Doing Business in the Firm Name of H & L Supply v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. PinckneyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1957
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alamo Water Transportation Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- State v. Davis.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Davis.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- United States v. The Tug SundialDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012