Legal Opinion

E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 6, 1964No. C.D. 2452PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

Two protests, 61/24855 and 61/24835, were consolidated for the purpose of trial and determination.

The merchandise in controversy was exported from Canada and is described on the entry papers as “steel-drop-forgings.”

The collector of customs classified the merchandise as cutting tools, not specially provided for, in paragraph 396 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 396), as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 84 Treas. Dec. 403, T.D. 52373, supplemented by Presidential proclamation, 85 Treas. Dec. 116, T.D. 52462, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. Briggs v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Prosser & Son v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API