Legal Opinion
ITT Industries, Inc. v. Wastecorp. Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 6, 2004No. 03-1309UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
This is a tale of one company’s efforts to extend the terms of its contract with another company. Wastecorp Inc. (‘Wastecorp”) obtained a license from ITT Industries, Inc. (“ITT”) to. use the MARLOW trademark for a term of four years. There is no question that the integrated contract between the parties stipulated a four-year term. Nor is there any question that Wastecorp, despite the protestations of ITT, continued to use the MARLOW mark after the expiration of the four-year term. Intuitively, this case is easily resolved: Wastecorp, it appears, willfully breached…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Max Rack, Inc. v. Core Health & Fitness, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Piccari v. GTLO Productions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Antares Pharma, Inc. v. Gordon Silver Limited and Verity Pharmaceuticals Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- GOSDEN v. ERAZORBITS, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. 4018 W. VINE STREET, LLLPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022