Legal Opinion
GOSDEN v. ERAZORBITS, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 25, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00075Unknown
1Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY PETER GOSDEN, d/b/a WICKED FISH APPAREL, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 22-00075 (GC) (DEA) v. OPINION ERAZORBITS, INC., Defendant. CASTNER, U.S.D.J. THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendant ErazorBits, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 70.) Plaintiffs opposed, and Defendant replied. (ECF Nos. 73 & 74.) The Court has carefully considered the parties’ submissions and decides the matter without oral argument…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Davis v. Wells Fargo, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun ThanooCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.