Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Hart

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1935No. Civil No. 3528PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is a proceeding by certiorari to review the action of the Industrial Commission in refusing compensation to petitioner for injuries he claims to have sustained as a pumpman and blacksmith while in the employ of W. L. Hart in the latter’s mining operations in the Harquahala mine near Salome, Arizona.

The sole ground set out in the petition for review of the proceedings of the commission is that the decision is contrary to, and is not supported by, the evidence. It is undisputed that on March 1, 1934, the petitioner, while in the performance of the work assigned to him and because the rungs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. Hodgman & Mac VicarArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Tucson Rapid Transit Co. v. RubaizArizona Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aluminum Co. of America v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Pace v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Eagle Indemnity Co. v. HadleyArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Eagle Indemnity Co. v. HadleyArizona Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API