Legal Opinion

Pace v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1950No. 5400PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This is a proceeding by certiorari to review the action of the respondent Industrial Commission of Arizona in denying compensation and accident benefits to O. D. Pace, petitioner, for an injury he sustained while employed by the Kennecott Copper Corporation,, respondent employer. *217in the latter’s power plant at Hayden, Arizona. It is only fair to state that the employer, a self-rater, strongly urged before the commission the justness of petitioner’s claim.

It is obvious from the record that this case reaches us only because of the commission’s dissatisfaction with our opinion in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Maxwell v. HartArizona Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DiSabatino & Sons, Inc. v. FaccioloSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  2. Figueroa v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API