Eagle Indemnity Co. v. Hadley
Arizona Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceUdall, Justice
(specially concurring).
I concur in the conclusion reached in the majority opinion that the commission was not in error in refusing to apportion the disability and that hence the award should be affirmed. Inasmuch, however, as I have reached this end result for reasons somewhat different from those advanced in the majority opinion, I deem it advisable to set forth in some detail the logic, as well as the reported cases, impelling this conclusion on my part.
L. B. Hadley, the respondent employee, was severely injured on November 17, 1944, as the result of an accident unquestionably arising out…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hoffman v. BrophyArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Congoleum Nairn, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Matlock v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Duprey's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.