Tucson Rapid Transit Co. v. Rubaiz

On this appeal the appellant contends that the only evidence sustaining the verdict and judgment is contained in the testimony of the plaintiff given in her own behalf. I quote from appellant’s brief, to wit:

“And that the evidence of the plaintiff as to the happening of the accident, and the result of it, is of so contradictory and unsatisfactory character as not to constitute any substantial evidence.”

We are requested to disregard all of plaintiff’s testimony as unworthy of belief for that reason, and, having disregarded her testimony, to hold that there is no substantial evidence in the…