Hillsdale Builders Supply Co. v. Eichler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
On this appeal from an order dismissing the action for want of prosecution the only question presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in making the order. The action was commenced on May 13, 1948, in a complaint against Eichler and several John Doe defendants alleging an oral promise of the defendants to answer for the debt of the corporate defendant, Camel, Inc. On June 30, 1948, the court sustained defendants’ demurrer to this complaint. On July 15, 1950, an amended complaint was filed naming two corporate defendants which were alleged to have obtained the assets of Camel,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Steinbauer v. BondesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Burbank v. Continental Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Simonini v. Jay Dee Leather Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Grass v. Rindge Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hayashi v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Bonelli v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Breckenridge v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Diverco Constructors, Inc. v. WilsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Sprajc v. Scandinavian Airlines System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.