Legal Opinion

Scott v. Life & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 19, 1925No. 16484PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Where a policy of insurance provided that no suit should be brought thereon “until sixty days after the claim thereunder has become due and proof thereof has been duly made” and where, after the claim had become due and proof thereof had been duly submitted, the insurer made an unconditional declaration of non-liability and an absolute refusal to pay, it was not necessary for the insured to postpone action on the policy until the expiration of such period. Such conduct by the insurer amounted to a waiver of the stipulation as to the time within which it should not be sued. Continental…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Continental Insurance v. WickhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Loewenherz v. WeilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brownell Combs, Ii, Administrator C.T.A. Of the Estate of Leslie Combs, Ii, Deceased v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Hetzel v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Staten v. General Exchange InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Continental Life Insurance v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  5. Sawyer v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API