Legal Opinion
Loewenherz v. Weil
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 17, 1925No. 16046PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
There is no contention by the plaintiffs in error that the contract should not be considered and the rights of the parties determined under the laws of this State. Their counsel having dealt with the case as one involving a Georgia, and not a New York, contract, we will dispose of it in this opinion, upon the assumption that the writings should be considered as composing a Georgia contract. The result, however, would probably be the same in either view. Harris v. Powers, 129 Ga. 74 (2) (58 S. E. 1038, 12 Ann. Cas. 475); Bailey v. Devine, 123 Ga. 653 (51 S.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Morrow v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Harris v. PowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Brown v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Clarke Bros. v. McNattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Hargroves v. CookeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. McDavidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Cooper v. G. E. Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Colson & Sons v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Scott v. Life & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Roberts v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.