Legal Opinion

Hetzel v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1929No. 6546PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Peesident:

This is an action on a non-eancellable income policy to recover certain accrued disability benefits claimed to be due thereunder. The insurance company prosecutes this writ from a judgment of the circuit court of Mercer County, entered on a .jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

On June 24, 1927, the defendant company issued its policy insuring the plaintiff against disability, commencing while the same is in force, resulting from bodily injury effected through accidental means and from sickness, whereby, in consideration of the payment of certain annual premiums to be paid…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lyon v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. Tucker v. Colonial Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Clark Millinery Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Pennington v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  5. Scott v. Life & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Mut. L. Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Bryant.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  4. Maynard v. National Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Wade v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API