Legal Opinion
Iris Corp. Berhad v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 2, 2008No. 06-801CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL2
MARY ELLEN COSTER WILLIAMS, Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Third-Party Defendant 3M Rochford Thompson’s (“3MRT”) motion to compel Plaintiff Iris Corporation Berhad (“IRIS Malaysia”) to produce infringement contentions and financial records. The Government supports 3MRT’s motion. Government’s Statement Regarding 3MRT’s Motion to Compel IRIS to Produce Infringement Contentions & Financial Records (“Gov’t Statement”) at 1. 3MRT contends that IRIS Malaysia has failed to produce an infringement claim chart which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Curtiss-Wright Flow Control, Corp. v. Velan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Embrex, Inc. v. Service Engineering Corp. And Edward G. Bounds, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Canvs Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Demodulation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- ATX Networks (Toronto) Corp. v. Technetix, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- FaceTec, Inc. v. iProov Ltd.District Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- FaceTec, Inc. v. iProov Ltd.District Court, D. Nevada · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.