Legal Opinion

FaceTec, Inc. v. iProov Ltd.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided September 10, 2024No. 2:21-cv-02252Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 FaceTec, Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-02252-ART-BNW 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. 7 iProov, Ltd., 8 Defendant. 9 10 iProov, Ltd., 11 Counter-Claimant, 12 v. 13 FaceTec, Inc., 14 Counter-Defendant. 15 16 17 This is a patent dispute over facial-recognition software in which both companies assert 18 patent-infringement claims against the other. Before the Court are two related motions: FaceTec’s 19 motion to compel (ECF No. 89) and iProov’s motion to strike (ECF No. 99). The Court heard oral 20 argument on both motions. For the reasons discussed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Iris Corp. Berhad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Technology Properties Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API