Legal Opinion
Curtiss-Wright Flow Control, Corp. v. Velan, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 15, 2006No. 2005-1373PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction in favor of Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation (Curtiss-Wright). After construing claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,565,714 (the ’714 patent), the trial court determined that Curtiss-Wright had shown a likelihood of success on the merits of its infringement action against Velan, Inc. Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corp. v. Velan, Inc., Civil Action No. SA-04-CA-1157-OG, slip op. at 18 (W.D.Tex. 2005) (Preliminary Injunction Order). Because the district court erred in its…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Voda v. Cordis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Apple, Inc. v. Ameranth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Allvoice Computing PLC v. Nuance Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Sinorgchem Co., Shandong v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Laboratories, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.