In re Chulak
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1986. He has maintained a law office in New Jersey, where he was also admitted to practice in 1986.
*745Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves for an order reciprocally disciplining respondent (see, 22 NYCRR 806.19) by reason of his recent three-month suspension from practice imposed by the New Jersey Supreme Court. Respondent was suspended for lack of candor toward a tribunal, assisting a non-attorney in the unauthorized practice of law, and misrepresentations.
Upon this record and having heard respondent in mitigation, we…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re GreenfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re GrushkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re ChulakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re LolioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re GaimanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re LolioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000